Algorithms and Data Structures
Status: Current Last modified: 2026-10-20 (commit f7e32e22)
This chapter is a map of algorithm boundaries, not a second specification of every enum variant or parser method. The linked chapters own the detailed contracts; generated API documentation owns exact signatures.
Owned CHAT model
A ChatFile contains ordered header and utterance lines. Each utterance carries
main-tier content and dependent tiers. Nested groups make main-tier content a
tree, so counting top-level items is not the same as counting words.
See Memory and Ownership for owned values, interned strings, source spans and revision-bound analysis. Enum variant counts and allocation measurements are not architectural invariants.
Parsing and admission
The Tree-sitter backend converts a concrete syntax tree to the typed model. Grammar acceptance, conversion, recovery and model validation are separate boundaries. A recovered model is not evidence that its input was valid.
Parsing describes the backends and public parsing surface.
Use the current parser trait/API for fragments rather than inventing a
method name by appending _fragment. Keep generated grammar artifacts with
their generating inputs; see Repository Architecture.
Traversal and structural alignment
Traversal must follow the selected domain’s treatment of words, groups, retracing and replacement content. A generic recursive walk is not a substitute for tier-specific eligibility.
Alignment owns those rules and the structural alignment algorithms. Structural alignment relates main-tier units to dependent-tier items; it does not establish acoustic timing.
%wor consumers instead use the checked timing transitions described in
%wor Timing Semantics. Matching counts alone cannot establish
word identity or acoustic correctness.
Structural merge and lexical evidence
Merge Architecture describes ordered-source assembly, source-bound selection and the validation/reporting transitions. It is not a global sort of independently flattened utterances.
Merge Domain Types distinguishes lexical scores, confidence states, mapping syntax and output validation. Lexical similarity can support a speaker decision but cannot prove recording identity.
Cache and deterministic output
Validation Cache owns the CHAT validation-cache contract. Cache reuse must preserve the relevant input and policy identity; a cache hit does not create new semantic evidence.
Choose collection order at each boundary: source order matters for transcript events, while a wire format may define sorted keys. Neither all hash maps nor all ordered maps are a universal correctness rule. Likewise, cache expensive regex construction where its actual call pattern warrants it; a blanket claim that every regex in the workspace has the same lifetime is not a contract.
This page last changed: 2026-10-20 (commit f7e32e22). The whole book last changed: 2026-10-27 (commit 5bfee2f9).